utah_court_cases:estate_attorney_malpractice_-_case_summary_murphy_v._housel
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
utah_court_cases:estate_attorney_malpractice_-_case_summary_murphy_v._housel [2022/08/11 21:19] admin created |
utah_court_cases:estate_attorney_malpractice_-_case_summary_murphy_v._housel [2022/08/11 21:21] admin |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| See our analysis of this case in the blog titled “TWO ATTORNEYS: WOULD YOU CHOOSE RIGHT THE FIRST TIME?“ | See our analysis of this case in the blog titled “TWO ATTORNEYS: WOULD YOU CHOOSE RIGHT THE FIRST TIME?“ | ||
| - | See Murphy v. Housel & Housel, 955 P.2d 880 (Wyoming 1988)[1]. | + | See Murphy v. Housel & Housel, 955 P.2d 880 (Wyoming 1988).((After Mr. Badura filed the lawsuit, Delphine Badura Murphy was substituted as a party to this case. Thus, the name of the case.)) |
| By: Kelly Perri | By: Kelly Perri | ||
| - | (([1] After Mr. Badura filed the lawsuit, Delphine Badura Murphy was substituted as a party to this case. Thus, the name of the case.)) | + | |
utah_court_cases/estate_attorney_malpractice_-_case_summary_murphy_v._housel.txt · Last modified: 2022/08/11 22:09 by admin